Majority Rule in International Organization: A Study of the Trend from Unanimity to Majority Decision
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
From Consumer Decision to Market Share - Unanimity of Majority?
We use a general cellular automata model to study the consumer decision-making process. Within this generalmodelweuse threedi erent rules governingword-of-mouthcommunication (w-o-m), onemajority rule and two unanimity rules, and ask the question if di erences between these three w-o-m rules, introduced on the microscopic level, will manifest on the macroscopic level. We show that in the model w...
متن کاملfrom linguistics to literature: a linguistic approach to the study of linguistic deviations in the turkish divan of shahriar
chapter i provides an overview of structural linguistics and touches upon the saussurean dichotomies with the final goal of exploring their relevance to the stylistic studies of literature. to provide evidence for the singificance of the study, chapter ii deals with the controversial issue of linguistics and literature, and presents opposing views which, at the same time, have been central to t...
15 صفحه اولMajority voting leads to unanimity
We consider a situation where society decides, through majority voting in a secret ballot, between the alternatives of ‘reform’ and ‘status quo’. Reform is assumed to create a minority of winners, while being efficient in the Kaldor–Hicks sense.We explore the consequences of allowing binding transfers between voters conditional on the chosen alternative. In particular, we establish conditions u...
متن کاملThe majority rule in individual decision making
This research investigates an understudied decision heuristic, the majority rule. By using the rule, decision makers choose the option superior on most of the available cues. Cues are broadly defined, including advisors and attributes. We propose that decision makers are more likely to use the majority rule when encouraged to employ intra-cue comparison as opposed to intra-option integration, a...
متن کاملMajority rule in the absence of a majority
Which is the best, impartially most plausible consensus view to serve as the basis of democratic group decision when voters disagree? Assuming that the judgment aggregation problem can be framed as a matter of judging a set of binary propositions (“issues”), we develop a multi-issue majoritarian approach based on the criterion of supermajority efficiency (SME). SME reflects the idea that smalle...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The American Historical Review
سال: 1941
ISSN: 0002-8762
DOI: 10.2307/1838782